{"id":"W2020601644","doi":"10.1111/1540-5982.t01-3-00003","title":"The evolution of preferences and competition: a rationalization of Veblen's theory of invidious comparisons","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Concurrence; Veblen good; Humanities; Rationalization (economics); Competition (biology); Premise; Philosophy; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Biology; Physics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004049598,0.0002841322,0.0003860301,0.001161326,0.001003136,0.002729005,0.001552508,0.001278901,0.009129709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01333767,0.000187653,0.0006711714,0.000885656,0.006850983,0.004593425,0.001701552,0.001449274,0.0003451181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00300936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006257938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002342722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002312274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975163,0.001469492,0.00005990558,0.000411909,0.0003999714,0.0001423373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958334,0.002283986,0.0006028519,0.000559969,0.0005085515,0.000211252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001784212,0.00000959656,0.001272965,0.00001561891,0.00001118808,0.00003979235,0.0004910734,0.002268477,0.00013439,0.9898589,0.0002986792,0.005581422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001183902,0.00001571463,0.00129772,0.000014413,0.000005134478,0.00006304008,0.0002755106,0.006848746,0.00006979098,0.988422,0.002967595,0.000008477191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3594652,0.001374635,0.2624921,0.01126387,0.0001532687,0.0001181083,0.0002008224,0.0000755404,0.3648565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981118,0.0001366556,0.01415996,0.0002691689,0.00002979796,0.00006173662,0.00002640139,0.00001612322,0.004182043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009129709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0305419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1326005082924272,"score_gpt":0.229188041450638,"score_spread":0.09658753315821086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}