{"id":"W2020651263","doi":"10.1080/10641260701689022","title":"Manipulations of Stocking Magnitude: Addressing Density-Dependence in a Juvenile Cohort of Common Snook (<i>Centropomus undecimalis)</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Mote Marine Laboratory and Aquarium; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission","keywords":"Stocking; Juvenile; Biology; Fishery; Hatchery; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Animal science; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001228125,0.0001254013,0.0004541533,0.0001221003,0.0002381688,0.000008445166,0.0005159162,0.00004019188,0.0003185463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000335275,0.0001208122,0.00004595181,0.001230486,0.002045378,0.000604108,0.0005333225,0.0001371784,0.00001885037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002141374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003538717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006741173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01189674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982697,0.0001266821,0.0005776149,0.0003571961,0.0003597949,0.0003090333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992347,0.00008969296,0.0002980501,0.0003217408,0.00001826422,0.00003753358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007226942,0.00009519479,0.996613,0.00005293867,0.00000182668,0.00001797227,0.000477079,0.0003169451,0.0005356519,0.0002606856,0.0006213001,0.001000242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001621032,0.00003500539,0.9943865,0.0001662253,0.000009008625,0.000008794659,0.0001252013,0.0002460567,0.0002875389,0.0002005095,0.004255793,0.000117277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9704837,0.000453471,0.0002157617,0.0001558116,0.000103419,0.0006475344,0.000001947488,0.00001215774,0.02792622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940152,0.003244428,0.002375253,0.0001325707,0.000004055287,0.00001893529,9.808743e-7,0.000004934841,0.0002036042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02772262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.753628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07065704506401609,"score_gpt":0.2886362910974457,"score_spread":0.2179792460334296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}