{"id":"W2020715135","doi":"10.1680/geot.2001.51.4.351","title":"Bearing capacity of spatially random soil: the undrained clay Prandtl problem revisited","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Géotechnique","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":363,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Bearing capacity; Geotechnical engineering; Random field; Shear strength (soil); Prandtl number; Spatial variability; Bearing (navigation); Factor of safety; Geology; Monte Carlo method; Mathematics; Soil science; Soil water; Statistics; Mechanics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005585643,0.0001921327,0.0003489074,0.0001263706,0.00006257702,0.00002440041,0.0002877665,0.0001836511,0.00004077472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009108498,0.000145329,0.0001760582,0.0005984189,0.00006057389,0.00006626087,0.00004227749,0.0004164012,0.000007415959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003894839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001171597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001185778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001627443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989322,0.00004148119,0.0003850536,0.0001703717,0.0001893769,0.0002815004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992711,0.00009734139,0.00005810918,0.0004465028,0.00006276913,0.00006420029],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004165421,0.00003701221,0.00008930811,0.0002142834,0.0001563619,0.00001077431,0.0001495417,0.8241543,0.1654336,0.001502914,0.0004959949,0.007714348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002138969,0.0001883047,0.0005322442,0.0006508853,0.0002865255,0.00008862839,0.00001671712,0.7193246,0.2319451,0.006596327,0.0372241,0.001007605],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04451089,0.0001790045,0.9470481,0.000432873,0.00004483715,0.0006515022,0.000008276213,0.001469141,0.005655367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993544,0.0002003089,0.005839129,0.0000344479,0.00006543139,0.00009893985,0.000007447385,0.0000397583,0.0001705475],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9490331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5926345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008717572517335468,"score_gpt":0.1951984031932902,"score_spread":0.1864808306759547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}