{"id":"W2020813649","doi":"10.1002/qre.833","title":"Comparison of Weibull small samples using Monte Carlo simulations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality and Reliability Engineering International","topic":"Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of New Brunswick","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Sample size determination; Weibull distribution; Monte Carlo method; Type I and type II errors; Reliability (semiconductor); Microelectronics; Sample (material); Reliability engineering; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000232403,0.00009230639,0.0001902483,0.00004902323,0.00005855714,0.00002062643,0.00008795007,0.00005956002,0.00007749231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001048632,0.00009306252,0.00005003454,0.00008814345,0.00005978506,0.00004935991,0.00003152371,0.00009143698,0.000001252066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006017035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001634906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003293799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001973058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989763,0.00002942675,0.0005636241,0.0001566279,0.000179149,0.00009488708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986141,0.0008614795,0.0001304304,0.0001506603,0.0002034739,0.00003986193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006848205,0.0002396026,0.01680754,0.0001093303,0.0000163845,8.412923e-8,0.00007260474,0.1757049,0.00152628,0.8053033,0.00009987564,0.0001132185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002237322,0.000008838139,0.1257011,0.00003076726,0.00002296922,0.000001225635,0.000038306,0.8320674,0.0008140706,0.04013984,0.0008246336,0.0001270626],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.503472,0.00001042601,0.4956496,0.0002264281,0.00006251108,0.00008001974,0.0003516243,0.00004293168,0.0001043662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9212915,8.266637e-7,0.07853807,0.00000805023,0.00004419031,0.000006302897,0.00006766543,0.000006600745,0.00003678434],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7651635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.379498,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1803562299929397,"score_gpt":0.4283226680784923,"score_spread":0.2479664380855525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}