{"id":"W2020851637","doi":"10.1080/19452829.2011.541734","title":"Responsible Pluralism, Capabilities, and Human Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Development and Capabilities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Capability approach; Entitlement (fair division); Pluralism (philosophy); Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Neglect; Reflective equilibrium; Value (mathematics); Value pluralism; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001784242,0.0001437004,0.0002834445,0.0001625829,0.00143825,0.00008405071,0.0001839338,0.0001368537,0.0002849341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001504461,0.0001171312,0.00005762543,0.00006827091,0.001590002,0.0004335348,0.00005411216,0.0002988244,0.000002677765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001138517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002997726,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001289976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002303336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983156,0.000244565,0.0005423328,0.0001483811,0.0004086255,0.0003405241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989864,0.0002428152,0.0001605721,0.0001004918,0.0002255897,0.0002841847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002728672,0.0000468468,0.003747836,0.00003695149,0.00002846545,0.0000108956,0.1522374,1.505842e-8,0.00003683315,0.8432788,0.0004290079,0.0001197493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004181165,0.0002626615,0.02003237,0.00009010317,0.00002392767,0.0000144789,0.01601119,4.410088e-8,0.0009831737,0.9185746,0.04336369,0.000225604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9182013,0.0002879983,9.362078e-7,0.0005510897,0.0001112897,0.00007866434,0.000001230804,0.00001911261,0.08074834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949444,0.00001940517,0.0005965994,0.0001160254,0.0002355574,0.000003271258,7.104949e-7,0.000007608556,0.004076434],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1362262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07570181161300618,"score_gpt":0.3139219736612688,"score_spread":0.2382201620482627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}