{"id":"W2020851637","doi":"10.1080/19452829.2011.541734","title":"Responsible Pluralism, Capabilities, and Human Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Development and Capabilities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Capability approach; Entitlement (fair division); Pluralism (philosophy); Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Neglect; Reflective equilibrium; Value (mathematics); Value pluralism; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007825068,0.0003650765,0.0003492994,0.001318055,0.003523358,0.005657877,0.0007038725,0.003828189,0.003146533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006275226,0.0001983006,0.0004208933,0.0008672506,0.04679284,0.007095286,0.005075927,0.004791582,0.0003306523],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004742867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00345696,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001826024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001445471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936632,0.004475244,0.0001825386,0.0004937391,0.0007797792,0.0004054823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944643,0.003482151,0.0005294305,0.000603041,0.0005336234,0.0003874388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001090395,0.000002255821,0.00001743686,0.000005830955,8.532492e-7,0.00001113271,0.0004170591,0.00007433256,0.00001321356,0.9985252,0.0003424117,0.0005891068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002954602,0.000003221321,0.00002835145,0.00002331402,7.923572e-7,0.00001430311,0.0002476973,0.0001232269,0.00003250262,0.9896387,0.009882833,0.000002239477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05105447,0.01150281,0.0812593,0.1459394,0.0007991227,0.00007677227,0.00006146211,0.00006337498,0.7092432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974409,0.001715068,0.006914346,0.003928703,0.0003385378,0.00007305672,0.00001516529,0.00001985686,0.01258629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007825068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04138339,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07570181161300618,"score_gpt":0.3139219736612688,"score_spread":0.2382201620482627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}