{"id":"W2020956532","doi":"10.1118/1.1449876","title":"Comparing calibration methods of electron beams using plane‐parallel chambers with absorbed‐dose to water based protocols","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Physics","topic":"Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; Montreal General Hospital","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Absorbed dose; Ionization chamber; Calibration; Laser beam quality; Monte Carlo method; Dosimetry; Electron; Beam (structure); Physics; Ionization; Cathode ray; Plane (geometry); Computational physics; Materials science; Optics; Nuclear physics; Atomic physics; Nuclear medicine; Radiation; Mathematics; Ion; Medicine; Geometry; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001749736,0.0001766095,0.0003236395,0.000027366,0.00007398066,0.00002102407,0.0001647607,0.00004821271,0.0002892084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003819187,0.0001249592,0.00005516788,0.0001397024,0.00009595438,0.0001314518,0.00002661127,0.0002137572,0.000001981294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004164309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004032976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008334234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001133084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987885,0.00007669011,0.00024682,0.000225196,0.0003553248,0.0003074304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994402,0.00004856334,0.00008988476,0.0002412863,0.00003622368,0.0001438622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001782837,0.005816337,0.09205901,0.00072814,0.001126454,0.00003316691,0.009490993,0.2330019,0.3726136,0.01260244,0.00315301,0.2675921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001195711,0.0003466829,0.00007328973,0.0001731296,0.00002130079,0.000001053356,0.000009752481,0.2763074,0.7177888,0.001468604,0.002295367,0.0003189161],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03907353,0.000004610559,0.9577304,0.0001162534,0.00001391301,0.002550391,0.000003230621,0.00006600472,0.0004416415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6572597,3.324013e-7,0.3409085,0.000239529,0.0002625223,0.00120389,0.00003453571,0.00005196549,0.00003903862],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6181862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5095688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03896184529459663,"score_gpt":0.3536289911754334,"score_spread":0.3146671458808368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}