{"id":"W2020987782","doi":"10.1088/1742-6596/42/1/018","title":"Enumeration Bounds via an Isoperimetric-Type Inequality","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Physics Conference Series","topic":"Geometric and Algebraic Topology","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Isoperimetric inequality; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Enumeration; Upper and lower bounds; Hyperplane; Cardinality (data modeling); Lattice (music); Exponent; Inequality; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Physics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003962984,0.0001382758,0.000353107,0.0001425705,0.0001017859,0.00009442206,0.0002016598,0.00007721348,0.0001617782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002525305,0.0001140629,0.00007991603,0.0005713472,0.0001069768,0.0007945558,0.00003022227,0.0002165377,0.00001027306],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003378479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001738861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006914671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002550095,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987826,0.0001139302,0.0005177304,0.0001096692,0.0002957355,0.0001803759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983482,0.0001284236,0.0005375941,0.0001889645,0.0007328998,0.0000639584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009734719,0.0004853774,0.0034514,0.00004668117,0.00005689025,0.00001441599,0.0007662303,0.0000221061,0.01523429,0.9397542,0.001018495,0.03905252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003292841,0.0007351978,0.004183032,0.00001384093,0.00004584108,0.00005755594,0.0003572184,0.00005188225,0.0665766,0.9264469,0.001036777,0.0001659245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8302513,0.00009125144,0.1672894,0.000284807,0.0004816109,0.00006199632,0.000003548774,0.00002389037,0.001512223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991806,0.00001585363,0.007034819,0.00003749227,0.0006569335,7.304218e-7,0.000005936974,0.00001231443,0.0004299191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1615547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4651349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06457364647168899,"score_gpt":0.3228770561090172,"score_spread":0.2583034096373282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}