{"id":"W2021038418","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-3180.2008.00664.x","title":"Modelling within‐field spatial variability of crop biomass – weed density relationships using geographically weighted regression","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Weed Research","topic":"Spatial and Panel Data Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Spatial variability; Weed; Edaphic; Spatial heterogeneity; Regression; Linear regression; Geographically Weighted Regression; Regression analysis; Spatial analysis; Biomass (ecology); Statistics; Environmental science; Mathematics; Soil science; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004284059,0.0001517037,0.0004865573,0.0008378269,0.0007614223,0.00004259967,0.0003735824,0.0003027736,0.0003195026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009687523,0.0001454325,0.000181425,0.001549572,0.0003093485,0.0002054497,0.0001973814,0.000740271,0.00006902936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007466273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008827802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09248483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003792391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975309,0.0003606261,0.0008751529,0.0005766972,0.0002544172,0.0004022134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978362,0.0006239231,0.0003152684,0.000697894,0.0003675936,0.0001591747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002966464,0.0003973258,0.9672273,0.000115519,0.0002160608,0.00003310061,0.0008035192,0.005442761,0.01028201,0.01470839,0.0001990979,0.0002782656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005405211,0.0001421234,0.06773417,0.00005679279,0.00002115487,0.000008644726,0.00005524731,0.89088,0.002835986,0.03705325,0.0003854812,0.0002866312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8630968,0.0001454077,0.1347306,0.0002165836,0.0001271632,0.0002686381,0.00007938265,0.00002458886,0.001310805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933277,0.00003954595,0.006263058,0.00001118265,0.0001102961,0.0000149392,0.00006587651,0.0000179801,0.0001494466],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8994932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9135584,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2490557223618713,"score_gpt":0.3172557788590345,"score_spread":0.06820005649716318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}