{"id":"W2021077702","doi":"10.1111/oik.02005","title":"Varied tastes: home range implications of foraging‐patch selection","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oikos","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Foraging; Ungulate; Home range; Range (aeronautics); Optimal foraging theory; Ecology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Forage; Geography; Predation; Habitat; Biology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004436502,0.0001214846,0.0003021078,0.0004633103,0.0002502614,0.0007557545,0.0003319065,0.0003377834,0.002180016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001610718,0.0001332962,0.0002060119,0.0002661224,0.001194827,0.0005559786,0.0005401433,0.0003002898,0.0001212045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002702351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008983863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00240544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006226143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998235,0.00005212588,0.000008167058,0.00006232508,0.00002665787,0.00002711535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993587,0.0002734061,0.000123203,0.00008627325,0.0000589811,0.00009947202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005947798,0.0001086396,0.9170982,0.0001426958,0.0002955534,0.0008573488,0.001603105,0.002877884,0.02923701,0.004189168,0.0003890757,0.04260656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000945967,0.00005473409,0.9925084,0.000008898707,0.00002871714,0.0003447274,0.0006198502,0.002026365,0.0004276152,0.0037673,0.0001945558,0.000009492746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970004,0.0002464767,0.0009714873,0.000127645,0.000002543512,0.000002089103,0.00003400307,0.000005324989,0.001610082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996377,0.00005144918,0.0001505658,0.00003165683,0.000004189109,0.000001287683,0.00001878023,0.000002347857,0.0001019522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00240544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007292867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02106228283330463,"score_gpt":0.2388903787329307,"score_spread":0.2178280958996261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}