{"id":"W2021343267","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0113648","title":"Species, Habitats, Society: An Evaluation of Research Supporting EU's Natura 2000 Network","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii; Autoritatea Natională pentru Cercetare Stiintifică","keywords":"Natura 2000; Habitats Directive; Ecological network; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Corporate governance; Biodiversity; Geography; Political science; Ecology; Business; Ecosystem; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2526956,0.001269924,0.003322109,0.05114385,0.002884937,0.01299872,0.003373796,0.00265129,0.005348979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4390212,0.0008599402,0.004673415,0.06094412,0.005077158,0.01430508,0.01220253,0.001934403,0.0004831543],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02006455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02605517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01764157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02559595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7219806,0.1634438,0.04686076,0.007052498,0.05642012,0.004242144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3177794,0.550147,0.06372189,0.00707706,0.05643832,0.004836298],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00372776,0.0006028392,0.1789176,0.2791925,0.01657849,0.001072444,0.04696148,0.001638952,0.0003909667,0.02773717,0.01325847,0.4299213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009905351,0.003345304,0.2863726,0.4217035,0.02695335,0.0008555146,0.1004851,0.001472095,0.0009528118,0.009693546,0.146873,0.000302613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2480979,0.6572465,0.00347104,0.02299904,0.001592013,0.006953162,0.00945025,0.00005819488,0.05013202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7681451,0.197223,0.01179237,0.006009452,0.0006922033,0.00993726,0.004707543,0.0001037945,0.001389278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7473044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9215593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1082471101703881,"score_gpt":0.3094134046028785,"score_spread":0.2011662944324903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}