{"id":"W2021538299","doi":"10.1145/2377656.2377657","title":"Systematizing pragmatic software reuse","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Reuse; Variety (cybernetics); Software engineering; Task (project management); Plan (archaeology); Software development; Process (computing); Source code; Software; Metaphor; Human–computer interaction; Systems engineering; Programming language; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007300525,0.001085441,0.0004128727,0.001638913,0.001883405,0.003866046,0.001819949,0.00171059,0.005763175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01823446,0.0009876089,0.001462753,0.0008532135,0.0115546,0.007571033,0.007905814,0.002762142,0.0008484352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002624589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004287225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004556456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005222199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991389,0.005046333,0.0005200965,0.001138926,0.001447433,0.000458278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870197,0.006278205,0.0008580576,0.004549233,0.001038563,0.00025624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004835176,0.00009994249,0.00243744,0.0003479735,0.0000402457,0.0002676899,0.01108199,0.01342907,0.00752781,0.8838968,0.002364308,0.07845832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001158392,0.0002474734,0.001577094,0.0002113196,0.00009070793,0.0008330579,0.003397471,0.1089427,0.01102432,0.760729,0.1127305,0.0001006466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.04867313,0.0002140773,0.916039,0.001779621,0.0000596262,0.0003479256,0.00007086989,0.001689966,0.03112585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4084948,0.0002615286,0.5819048,0.0003791639,0.00003091546,0.000481923,0.0002370964,0.0003957963,0.007813944],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007300525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03860933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08412914294878511,"score_gpt":0.3257056353884473,"score_spread":0.2415764924396622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}