{"id":"W2021545675","doi":"10.1016/j.supflu.2012.02.011","title":"Thermodynamic prediction of vapor–liquid equilibrium of supercritical CO2 or CHF3+ ionic liquids","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Supercritical Fluids","topic":"Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Supercritical fluid; Thermodynamics; Binary number; Activity coefficient; Dilution; Equation of state; Ionic liquid; Chemistry; Vapor–liquid equilibrium; Phase (matter); Physical chemistry; Physics; Mathematics; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002205479,0.0002445548,0.0002318035,0.0005201639,0.0004107131,0.0004986062,0.0004602901,0.0002763578,0.001502002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006862038,0.0001538579,0.000293228,0.0002255275,0.0003395665,0.0004364469,0.0002841718,0.0002659502,0.0002454975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007595182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005719117,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01750227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009493413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999168,0.00001235403,0.000003431336,0.00001098116,0.00003775969,0.00001867857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998102,0.00009222247,0.00001195206,0.00001272469,0.00006216255,0.00001083873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007608664,0.0002276394,0.01876411,0.00017362,0.00005315035,0.0003286979,0.0001115038,0.5747681,0.3676208,0.01513521,0.0008568882,0.02119944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001659329,0.00004973378,0.002438553,0.000002416193,0.000006171683,0.00001540502,0.00001712556,0.8721322,0.124302,0.0006152233,0.0003943266,0.00001029848],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803116,0.0001713676,0.01344154,0.00006395809,0.00002468733,0.00001955607,0.0001050627,0.0001048098,0.005757447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987383,0.00003151806,0.0006187615,0.00000350407,0.000004591874,0.000003753644,0.00004406368,0.00001202193,0.0005434146],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01750227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03480083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01918402285826156,"score_gpt":0.2448243909708886,"score_spread":0.2256403681126271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}