{"id":"W2021597683","doi":"10.1067/mob.2002.128090","title":"The effect of mode of delivery and gestational age on neonatal outcome of the non-cephalic-presenting second twin","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","topic":"Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Cephalic presentation; Gestational age; Neonatal intensive care unit; Vaginal delivery; Obstetrics; Odds ratio; External cephalic version; Apgar score; Caesarean section; Twin Pregnancy; Odds; Pregnancy; Gestation; Pediatrics; Logistic regression; Internal medicine; Breech presentation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001645182,0.0002812149,0.0005202018,0.000561536,0.0002852366,0.0006095382,0.0005345533,0.0006092124,0.002459181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01048554,0.0001801068,0.0008503376,0.0004415839,0.0004437492,0.0004447688,0.0004044013,0.0008370397,0.0002141867],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004396178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005333895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001672759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002635172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991974,0.00044506,0.00006235381,0.00008424812,0.00008195097,0.0001290104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917626,0.005212702,0.001209144,0.0004773293,0.0002081181,0.001130129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01844503,0.0003609108,0.9639224,0.00003030508,0.0002768678,0.002283933,0.0002513512,0.0002920695,0.004224969,0.0001941045,0.000159591,0.009558455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000134783,0.004054005,0.9901872,0.00001814477,0.0002510429,0.002972704,0.000332609,0.0008810052,0.0007127909,0.0002203921,0.0002151268,0.00002021075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990808,0.000250062,0.00003884323,0.00006014712,0.00001338902,0.000002811195,0.00005189621,0.000001775183,0.0005003522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994123,0.000165069,0.00004835298,0.00001792992,0.00002733969,0.000003393239,0.00005458791,0.000005430184,0.0002656991],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002459181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008700609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01062302762490322,"score_gpt":0.2613079620260572,"score_spread":0.250684934401154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}