{"id":"W2021696307","doi":"10.1002/tax.601033","title":"Synopsis of Proposals on Botanical Nomenclature – Melbourne 2011: A review of the proposals concerning the <i>International Code of Botanical Nomenclature</i> submitted to the XVIII International Botanical Congress","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Taxon","topic":"Botanical Studies and Applications","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum","funders":"","keywords":"Botanical garden; SAINT; Nomenclature; Library science; Citation; History; Art history; Computer science; Biology; Botany; Taxonomy (biology)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004489704,0.001192081,0.002346687,0.009073338,0.0007683712,0.003745577,0.001937725,0.002033711,0.008314803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00779405,0.0006025272,0.0007441158,0.01559738,0.001457367,0.004099102,0.002222719,0.003925112,0.003934762],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003747401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00994227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007926856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02125555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980127,0.0004553333,0.00044544,0.0001585321,0.0008280425,0.00009994984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958773,0.001456955,0.0007286535,0.0001051497,0.001599049,0.0002328507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001073877,0.00004760728,0.0001397518,0.03878232,0.00005672861,0.0001915571,0.0004263728,0.0002160711,0.001617163,0.01427068,0.5607424,0.383402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000487852,0.00001463683,0.0004643671,0.00741224,0.00002090493,0.0001195993,0.00009379918,0.00001338238,0.00004848199,0.0007026473,0.9910931,0.00001196031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007167137,0.9888283,0.0001737054,0.003656273,0.004569357,0.00003274742,0.0001486892,0.000009820573,0.002509373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005401619,0.9896777,0.0007909114,0.004151477,0.001365641,0.00005518375,0.0003246086,0.00001044341,0.003083826],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02781582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06648148026370578,"score_gpt":0.300603785172524,"score_spread":0.2341223049088182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}