{"id":"W2021696307","doi":"10.1002/tax.601033","title":"Synopsis of Proposals on Botanical Nomenclature – Melbourne 2011: A review of the proposals concerning the <i>International Code of Botanical Nomenclature</i> submitted to the XVIII International Botanical Congress","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Taxon","topic":"Botanical Studies and Applications","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum","funders":"","keywords":"Botanical garden; SAINT; Nomenclature; Library science; Citation; History; Art history; Computer science; Biology; Botany; Taxonomy (biology)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001493947,0.0005478987,0.001780661,0.000009273632,0.0003192878,0.00004867523,0.003897383,0.0004205906,0.001044681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007645502,0.0001515837,0.001159533,0.0006637243,0.0006381627,0.00006132893,0.001202355,0.001082692,0.00005349127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001236122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007788007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000162702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005162663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952486,0.0005326719,0.001888906,0.0007263926,0.001172233,0.000431173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953989,0.001408131,0.00188282,0.0005898991,0.0005732835,0.000146922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002162817,0.001225195,0.000221194,0.003972881,0.001729367,0.000004592991,0.00009451807,9.627665e-7,0.001393597,0.0265178,0.06068572,0.9039379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001292347,0.0002379237,0.000490619,0.01280728,0.0004611218,0.00002269875,0.00003006335,0.000005062724,0.00009583318,0.0001127756,0.9853309,0.0002764209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001137756,0.9627535,0.000007605423,0.02557926,0.001126875,0.004497872,0.002041794,0.00004029219,0.002815012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009278503,0.9872078,0.0001255791,0.001614554,0.0006305958,0.0004886107,0.0000722305,0.000011653,0.0005705133],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9246452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06648148026370578,"score_gpt":0.300603785172524,"score_spread":0.2341223049088182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}