{"id":"W2021816871","doi":"10.1007/s11284-014-1211-9","title":"Reconsidering the role of ‘semi‐natural habitat’ in agricultural landscape biodiversity: a case study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Research","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Species evenness; Biodiversity; Habitat; Ecology; Gamma diversity; Woodland; Geography; Species diversity; Spatial heterogeneity; Natural (archaeology); Landscape ecology; Beta diversity; Agroforestry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001748261,0.00006395115,0.0001286443,0.00003506665,0.000360611,0.00001420976,0.0002014819,0.00005404061,0.0003970968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008706227,0.00003507868,0.00002986779,0.0003340378,0.0003617867,0.00006585577,0.000530725,0.0003912855,0.0001859595],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007156414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005383137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002192724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03798163,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985867,0.0005589396,0.0001455792,0.0002094547,0.0002118596,0.0002875336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983225,0.001467128,0.00003269655,0.0001131223,0.00002611744,0.00003846877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001165456,0.0002020823,0.9963539,0.000001333593,0.000008230361,0.0001064256,0.001803188,0.0002426602,0.000175573,0.00009327583,0.0002649673,0.0007367409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002487319,0.000300321,0.969624,0.000001391175,0.000002998547,0.00004510925,0.02644092,0.001694808,0.00002239254,0.001503203,0.00006553964,0.00005061699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906927,0.0000405883,5.6412e-7,0.0006363033,0.00003752005,0.0003017212,9.20749e-7,0.000009267496,0.008280434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997571,0.000005620391,0.0000397143,0.00003551934,0.000008842365,0.0000307969,6.483657e-7,0.000001178166,0.0001206017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03776235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9795727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07584387368060105,"score_gpt":0.3022008665430277,"score_spread":0.2263569928624266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}