{"id":"W2021829121","doi":"10.1115/detc2013-13437","title":"Comparison of Cylindrical Wrapping Geometries to Via Points for Modeling Muscle Paths in the Estimation of Sit-to-Stand Muscle Forces","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Muscle activation and electromyography studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inverse dynamics; Kinematics; Torque; Cylinder; Mechanics; Work (physics); Tension (geology); Rotation (mathematics); Muscle contraction; Geometry; Mathematics; Computer science; Physics; Anatomy; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000790744,0.001133093,0.0004433564,0.0008034314,0.0001541323,0.0007171964,0.0005513048,0.0006189555,0.000782038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004564127,0.0004728857,0.0005854002,0.0007114212,0.0003811511,0.0007162041,0.0005139139,0.0003068513,0.0003767323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002665854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005672673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003145536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002948592,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994715,0.0002764771,0.00003273908,0.00007190119,0.0001212418,0.00002604757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983448,0.001030312,0.0001817104,0.0002201006,0.000181518,0.00004163291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002313674,0.00003554054,0.003321316,0.0001049902,0.00002926314,0.0001609195,0.0001885483,0.9107504,0.01271402,0.004654209,0.0003046321,0.06750477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006443865,0.00009573439,0.001685294,0.0000163581,0.0000104195,0.0001119143,0.00004618693,0.993467,0.002723243,0.001045285,0.0007688424,0.00002336496],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1274271,0.0002365461,0.870095,0.00007688921,0.0000230729,0.0001023194,0.000182033,0.0005781595,0.001278879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.664829,0.000514377,0.3334647,0.00002046777,0.00001094561,0.000149603,0.0003700856,0.0001628004,0.0004780386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003145536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006254494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0287907062818514,"score_gpt":0.2796639021982947,"score_spread":0.2508731959164433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}