{"id":"W2022095654","doi":"10.3138/jsp.38.1.1","title":"Plagiarism, Publishing, and the Academy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Misconduct; Public relations; Ambivalence; Order (exchange); Dishonesty; Identity (music); Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Academic dishonesty; Political science; Media studies; Law; Business; Psychology; Higher education; Social psychology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01637345,0.0002114767,0.0003931383,0.0005451278,0.00125994,0.3474341,0.002529911,0.0003339377,0.0001429017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009468933,0.0001326855,0.0002059601,0.0002170285,0.0005603997,0.3259151,0.0004096426,0.007034425,0.000006688552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001102804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000153949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001497739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002454923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963152,0.0006943406,0.001103797,0.0002054078,0.001311527,0.0003696927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951562,0.001004855,0.001334169,0.0003682702,0.001959071,0.0001773931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008389732,0.0000491023,0.002167224,0.000009564217,0.00006028006,0.0000050566,0.007238301,0.000008686835,0.00004034736,0.7416803,0.2429787,0.00567857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002652278,0.00004069724,0.007536637,0.00009541282,0.00007974182,0.0001215926,0.004031871,0.00009168047,0.00001661842,0.1082387,0.876901,0.0001937663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3107993,0.0165881,0.0002410573,0.3460373,0.001906245,0.0002597165,0.00002507892,0.000130079,0.3240131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873056,0.0001685606,0.0006475208,0.003783959,0.003927872,0.000005113503,0.00001249194,0.00003143435,0.004117419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6765063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03540922971001967,"score_gpt":0.2296023244091336,"score_spread":0.1941930946991139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}