{"id":"W2022181332","doi":"10.1139/x05-211","title":"Using multivariate factorial kriging for multiscale ordination: a case study","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Soil Geostatistics and Mapping","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología; Comunidad de Madrid","keywords":"Ordination; Principal component analysis; Variogram; Multidimensional scaling; Multivariate statistics; Scale (ratio); Statistics; Mathematics; Vegetation (pathology); Kriging; Spatial variability; Geostatistics; Environmental science; Geography; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003168639,0.0004722767,0.0006821001,0.0008906025,0.0008171125,0.0007636594,0.0008366291,0.00112043,0.0007686188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006120127,0.0002268058,0.0008846903,0.003228305,0.0004857662,0.0005464614,0.0005949314,0.0004653162,0.0001105752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007246849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006502431,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02228096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04225847,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984161,0.00100765,0.00007907352,0.0001257841,0.0002805708,0.00009088877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958751,0.003008805,0.0001757932,0.0004678437,0.0003762068,0.00009632036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007185762,0.001724253,0.1345803,0.0008789498,0.0003840411,0.01472288,0.004416448,0.434198,0.01358563,0.01532207,0.003604967,0.3758638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003387176,0.001317509,0.08578112,0.0001251829,0.0002475163,0.003506107,0.003364154,0.8696551,0.01174921,0.01024535,0.01349625,0.0001738483],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.860007,0.0004603814,0.1350144,0.0004609057,0.00001554988,0.0002380005,0.0003107106,0.000198602,0.003294422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7861162,0.0002946112,0.2127573,0.00002735864,0.000008820624,0.0001187993,0.0001197966,0.00004058165,0.0005166084],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02228096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04430252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.14250062954051,"score_gpt":0.4060423920718173,"score_spread":0.2635417625313073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}