{"id":"W2022255738","doi":"10.1109/ccece.2008.4564528","title":"Verification of program dynamic behaviours based on static analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering","topic":"Software Testing and Debugging Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Static analysis; Coding (social sciences); Program analysis; Dynamic program analysis; Static program analysis; Source code; Dynamic programming; State (computer science); Code (set theory); Programming language; Algorithm; Software; Software development","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002613609,0.001227503,0.0009845949,0.00282015,0.0008436835,0.001223852,0.001351179,0.0008203474,0.002129684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01296401,0.0008082569,0.001606956,0.001033023,0.001710209,0.00275127,0.001106723,0.001013967,0.0006725118],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001092228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002431883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003110818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002544257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949587,0.001126932,0.0003694821,0.0007183569,0.002454121,0.0003724239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848909,0.007251413,0.001438746,0.003659824,0.002624894,0.0001343344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001072145,0.000610078,0.02288921,0.00129988,0.0004356722,0.001571892,0.001124373,0.2777979,0.3466994,0.0571342,0.002211575,0.2871538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007372801,0.0004536684,0.00376502,0.0001378451,0.0001720663,0.0005925617,0.000129131,0.7599401,0.2096305,0.02021846,0.004790585,0.00009627866],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08543289,0.0001195343,0.9012968,0.00008734992,0.00002697973,0.0001743948,0.0003681424,0.01025655,0.002237432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7204944,0.0002257721,0.2749162,0.00008363716,0.00002754457,0.0004325962,0.001056239,0.001104474,0.001659097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003110818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0138222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02033448777341849,"score_gpt":0.2336014875384555,"score_spread":0.213266999765037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}