{"id":"W2022255738","doi":"10.1109/ccece.2008.4564528","title":"Verification of program dynamic behaviours based on static analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering","topic":"Software Testing and Debugging Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Static analysis; Coding (social sciences); Program analysis; Dynamic program analysis; Static program analysis; Source code; Dynamic programming; State (computer science); Code (set theory); Programming language; Algorithm; Software; Software development","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001441652,0.0002722965,0.0003654148,0.001022586,0.0001317034,0.0001786586,0.0005927665,0.0001140144,0.000005825162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007663551,0.0002716351,0.00008005847,0.001451205,0.00006599464,0.0001682445,0.00003690133,0.0003039044,0.000002360111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001289375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003967972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001531456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001277447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983286,0.00001233268,0.0002934157,0.0005685697,0.0003091339,0.0004879052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987844,0.0001038419,0.0001125487,0.0002647713,0.0003373079,0.0003971119],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006105139,0.0008777627,0.06682237,0.0002530283,0.0003781517,0.0001453203,0.002417231,0.007956398,0.000543046,0.2114061,0.001822482,0.7073171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000137336,0.0006684799,0.04320298,0.00008468229,0.00003330273,0.00001269768,0.000001294709,0.9547184,0.0001625038,0.0006548538,0.00003661892,0.0002868176],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1513512,0.00002392602,0.8449303,0.0006023386,0.00007407189,0.0003891678,0.000008678645,0.002261868,0.0003584121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9353395,0.00001486591,0.06437527,0.0001610043,0.00001410671,0.0000604724,0.00001011382,0.00001296557,0.00001172745],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.946762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02033448777341849,"score_gpt":0.2336014875384555,"score_spread":0.213266999765037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}