{"id":"W2022359922","doi":"10.1139/x09-004","title":"Long-term effects of tanoak competition on Douglas-fir stand development","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Canopy; Diameter at breast height; Forestry; Douglas fir; Fagaceae; Understory; Thinning; Stand development; Botany; Horticulture; Mathematics; Biology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002261623,0.0002502359,0.00020508,0.0001736757,0.0003616762,0.0004137276,0.0002776797,0.0001898589,0.0008400933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004236048,0.0001377029,0.0001313727,0.0001035914,0.0002465185,0.0002339078,0.000320167,0.0003211504,0.0001222921],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008995099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003820702,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01302399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07523768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998854,0.00001677829,0.00000852161,0.00003251196,0.0000181168,0.00003866248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994112,0.0001158983,0.0001376572,0.00002180662,0.00007334741,0.0002400954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003356389,0.0007571076,0.570097,0.00009769374,0.0001532976,0.000768216,0.0005028236,0.0005151846,0.4110773,0.0001156414,0.0002416021,0.01231771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008341798,0.0004122028,0.9949833,0.000003547307,0.00001761847,0.00007479762,0.0001464215,0.000209923,0.003849528,0.00001383654,0.0002737299,0.00000672372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.999734,0.00006629177,0.00001205398,0.000003465836,0.000001593145,0.000001300879,0.00003709423,8.425324e-7,0.0001435201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993485,0.00003758633,0.00003807109,0.00001676429,0.000001847423,0.000004259311,0.00015159,0.000001295268,0.0004000606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.986976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02589637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01793376284010975,"score_gpt":0.2768552778233808,"score_spread":0.258921514983271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}