{"id":"W2022551092","doi":"10.1080/10934529.2012.660093","title":"Quantitative bacteriological assessment of aerobic wastewater treatment quality and plant performance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A","topic":"Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs","keywords":"Effluent; Wastewater; Sewage treatment; Aerobic bacteria; Secondary treatment; Environmental science; Population; Environmental engineering; Heterotroph; Pulp and paper industry; Bacteria; Biology; Engineering; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001766164,0.0001435396,0.0003226663,0.00005185794,0.0002429855,0.00001671057,0.000108433,0.00003221957,0.0002393742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000489088,0.00008664546,0.00004283445,0.00008525974,0.0008425241,0.0006059468,0.0001253633,0.00008353042,0.00000918944],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004712332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004424474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000491881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006143816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983644,0.00009023966,0.0004903578,0.0001741566,0.0004798145,0.0004010145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991022,0.0000358796,0.0003920426,0.00009803027,0.000003949061,0.0003678694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007232973,0.0004650689,0.8770516,0.0000147515,0.00001831643,0.000002522306,0.001106204,0.00001039598,0.1170737,0.00005328958,0.00004663376,0.004085169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005491728,0.002544965,0.9867347,0.00002308281,0.00001555561,0.0001111931,0.0004538975,0.00007577688,0.008067053,0.00001053318,0.001319827,0.00009422917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988862,0.0003231714,0.000003008773,0.0003807883,0.0000977233,0.0001566746,0.0000124303,0.000002238021,0.0001377629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935614,0.001338581,0.004898489,0.000122772,0.0000337817,0.000003320272,0.000002274721,0.000004084761,0.00003528591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1096831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3533299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08997017073171422,"score_gpt":0.351320396041529,"score_spread":0.2613502253098148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}