{"id":"W2022589600","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.07.001","title":"Peer-led interventions to reduce HIV risk of youth: A review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Peer education; Condom; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Peer group; Program Design Language; Program evaluation; Public relations; Positive Youth Development; Medicine; Psychology; Environmental health; Medical education; Health education; Political science; Public health; Family medicine; Nursing; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009628613,0.000355545,0.001642347,0.0002707861,0.0005265835,0.00001181368,0.0001832219,0.0002968045,0.000229056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003365659,0.0002591821,0.0003555339,0.0006290686,0.00004325904,0.00006659175,0.0001070726,0.001154469,0.0001535928],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001467821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006802204,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001821187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002618828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927177,0.003787921,0.00170969,0.0006391561,0.0007279701,0.0004175667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964201,0.0002729951,0.001607552,0.0004752243,0.0009825834,0.0002415455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001143937,0.0001591333,0.000108976,0.1068417,0.00005791626,4.985915e-7,0.00168744,9.176818e-7,2.989485e-8,0.00002657049,0.009098678,0.8820067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002411074,0.0002217606,0.0003846399,0.3037133,0.001823272,0.000003036688,0.0005802501,0.00001240853,2.664595e-8,0.00003198782,0.6927969,0.0001913145],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003311842,0.9847192,0.0001474997,0.000895564,0.0005549436,0.0116919,0.0001491482,0.0001188341,0.001689769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00002391529,0.9924085,0.00124499,0.0002407779,0.000461496,0.001024293,0.001146342,0.00003561784,0.003414123],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8818154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5060799930559863,"score_gpt":0.6377364766603129,"score_spread":0.1316564836043266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}