{"id":"W2022642890","doi":"10.1097/wnr.0b013e32832a0a7c","title":"Joint attention helps infants learn new words: event-related potential evidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neuroreport","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Max-Planck-Institut für Kognitions- und Neurowissenschaften; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Psychology; Joint attention; Lexicon; Cognitive psychology; Priming (agriculture); Negativity effect; Mental lexicon; Tone (literature); Event-related potential; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Linguistics; Neuroscience; Autism","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002541888,0.0002029856,0.0002124406,0.0001438798,0.00009154173,0.00005251976,0.0001680643,0.0001437616,0.004121073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001876223,0.0001914438,0.0001492822,0.0003222672,0.00003076266,0.0002560747,0.00004016767,0.0002686489,0.00106567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002433606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001156087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001465376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001094052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980412,0.00008481616,0.0005949772,0.0005182413,0.0003636226,0.0003972012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990593,0.00001762715,0.0002717035,0.0004406605,0.00004971229,0.0001609785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009751125,0.001219347,0.1992418,0.00003541583,0.0003764306,0.0144213,0.01066434,0.0001564155,0.06543228,0.001537511,0.2972701,0.4086699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009265734,0.0001659067,0.993845,0.0000588828,0.00004624206,0.0004746763,0.0002422105,0.00002375121,0.0002016295,0.0009975673,0.002722123,0.0002953951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9717542,0.0005906396,0.0005833005,0.002122603,0.001975113,0.0003110949,6.99041e-7,0.0002583436,0.02240401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597439,0.00003275873,0.0001145008,0.001209993,0.0001411525,0.000007061758,0.00003007598,0.00002168149,0.03869893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7946032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02963554805103799,"score_gpt":0.3127850856958576,"score_spread":0.2831495376448196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}