{"id":"W2022658141","doi":"10.1007/s11356-009-0125-5","title":"Endosulfan in China 2—emissions and residues","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","topic":"Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Dalian Maritime University; Harbin Institute of Technology","keywords":"Endosulfan; China; Environmental science; Pesticide; Residue (chemistry); Latitude; Environmental chemistry; Pesticide residue; Longitude; Persistent organic pollutant; Agriculture; Pollutant; Chemistry; Geography; Agronomy; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001999595,0.0001146754,0.000100068,0.0001979637,0.0006741869,0.00008400531,0.0002883545,0.00005732463,0.001230237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002041016,0.0000969102,0.00001132096,0.0008456808,0.002421177,0.0006096413,0.0003461056,0.000298509,0.0001409489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005498626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003939612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002056138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005525931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974126,0.0001115713,0.0001597188,0.0004898733,0.001128918,0.0006972835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993138,0.00002795006,0.00002522663,0.0002312608,6.17625e-7,0.0004011876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001593043,0.00008893698,0.03389477,5.522875e-7,6.191706e-7,0.00001288356,0.0009591978,0.00000569993,0.7184979,0.0001088321,0.0003471067,0.2460675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002560087,0.0001681778,0.979777,0.000008823243,9.327942e-7,0.00003206914,0.000322859,0.0002002817,0.01552102,0.001368753,0.002238522,0.0001055992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836205,0.0001545047,0.00000391716,0.004567168,0.00002251023,0.0002033403,0.00001555967,0.00001575186,0.01139672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984416,0.000403543,0.0001658983,0.0002371136,0.00001976822,0.000002524597,3.348455e-7,0.000005076517,0.0007241721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9458822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01941304716417349,"score_gpt":0.3142202274381874,"score_spread":0.294807180274014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}