{"id":"W2022660857","doi":"10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.053","title":"A proposed maximum ratio criterion applied to mixed mode fatigue crack propagation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Materials & Design (1980-2015)","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fracture mechanics; Materials science; Crack growth resistance curve; Fracture (geology); Mechanics; Structural engineering; Crack closure; Aspect ratio (aeronautics); Mode (computer interface); Composite material; Engineering; Physics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001769762,0.001067832,0.001101883,0.001667262,0.000587131,0.001112898,0.002047095,0.00138139,0.003491306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003285303,0.0003441942,0.0008400213,0.0007566596,0.0005519979,0.001189926,0.001008667,0.000614551,0.001347521],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006649547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009990718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00165528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002346732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983741,0.0003973051,0.0001138583,0.0002553598,0.0007749105,0.00008445112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986219,0.0003894051,0.00007760071,0.00007723634,0.0007873799,0.00004650147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004221078,0.0002187355,0.002021696,0.0008569387,0.00009307532,0.0003401944,0.0001928315,0.3185521,0.1404003,0.05067795,0.004983883,0.4812402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001398422,0.0001254242,0.0005314541,0.00002139049,0.00001934637,0.0001236963,0.00001455688,0.9816356,0.0114403,0.003658531,0.002391734,0.00002406725],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01048076,0.0003857498,0.9844781,0.00006097874,0.00006874179,0.00006794871,0.00005789942,0.0003096694,0.004090159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2975875,0.0004348777,0.6958383,0.00008445956,0.0001702356,0.000256219,0.0002459234,0.0003870598,0.004995416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003491306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01167959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01950434930760503,"score_gpt":0.2514895329954551,"score_spread":0.23198518368785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}