{"id":"W2022735044","doi":"10.1016/j.jprocont.2011.06.007","title":"Latent variable model predictive control for trajectory tracking in batch processes: Alternative modeling approaches","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Process Control","topic":"Fault Detection and Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Trajectory; Latent variable; Model predictive control; Computer science; Variable (mathematics); Identification (biology); Control theory (sociology); Tracking (education); Batch processing; Latent variable model; Principal component analysis; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Control (management)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004139372,0.001277736,0.002342659,0.000798846,0.0007494451,0.002516761,0.002425911,0.001677694,0.002423468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008013677,0.001008099,0.00145869,0.0013823,0.001791077,0.00291005,0.001681818,0.002501257,0.0004328126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001773688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002317135,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01980381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01397469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986627,0.000638585,0.00007975286,0.0002509562,0.0002137795,0.0001541502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944351,0.004350571,0.0003977713,0.0002401728,0.0004977393,0.00007871385],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000138715,0.00005332203,0.0003588782,0.0001150835,0.00009910442,0.00003187455,0.0001015291,0.9526228,0.0003234671,0.02984715,0.00046784,0.0158402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000567798,0.000005864227,0.0000376358,0.00000277801,0.000006330391,0.000001142518,0.00000289733,0.9958503,0.00004349024,0.003990441,0.00004896557,0.000004484547],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01563482,0.0005850986,0.9822403,0.0004106268,0.00005905455,0.00002178178,0.00008678429,0.0001410367,0.0008205659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9010842,0.001324982,0.08999427,0.0001758643,0.000212474,0.0002501305,0.0004728264,0.0001405982,0.006344558],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01980381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03937709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05031394731806092,"score_gpt":0.2399530039133955,"score_spread":0.1896390565953346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}