{"id":"W2022858746","doi":"10.1080/01431161.2010.510810","title":"Relationship between canopy height and Landsat ETM+ response in lowland Amazonian rainforest","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Remote Sensing Letters","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Nova Scotia Community College","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; Ohio State University","keywords":"Canopy; Rainforest; Thematic Mapper; Swamp; Environmental science; Tree canopy; Floodplain; Remote sensing; Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; Geography; Leaf area index; Physical geography; Forestry; Ecology; Cartography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005432072,0.0001548556,0.0001601625,0.0001112817,0.0001790735,0.00003490136,0.00008953407,0.0000932992,0.00002665401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001333048,0.0001509923,0.00003478101,0.0003093327,0.0002339569,0.00009725457,0.0000624021,0.0002423903,0.0002281488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001409298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001223465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003510199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006421913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987643,0.000176336,0.0002389965,0.0003381896,0.0001729445,0.0003091726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991335,0.0003081495,0.00007483867,0.0003495578,0.000004641111,0.0001293714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001589416,0.000009078329,0.9597306,0.000007654608,0.00000809977,0.00007429387,0.00461989,0.0001035538,0.01061931,0.00001304987,0.001647408,0.02300814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000327997,0.00001823524,0.9913121,0.00003030317,0.00001300668,0.00004505701,0.00005338293,0.002111396,0.0005578726,0.0003180488,0.005012979,0.0001996174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873313,0.000007054805,0.002265419,0.003841963,0.00004431116,0.000155912,0.000002439999,0.00005528101,0.006296313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848986,0.000002391977,0.01394357,0.0007888898,0.00004671362,3.829274e-8,0.000007879156,0.00002191829,0.0002900321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03158153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6157286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02797777678425367,"score_gpt":0.2304485597417962,"score_spread":0.2024707829575426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}