{"id":"W2022858746","doi":"10.1080/01431161.2010.510810","title":"Relationship between canopy height and Landsat ETM+ response in lowland Amazonian rainforest","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Remote Sensing Letters","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Nova Scotia Community College","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; Ohio State University","keywords":"Canopy; Rainforest; Thematic Mapper; Swamp; Environmental science; Tree canopy; Floodplain; Remote sensing; Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; Geography; Leaf area index; Physical geography; Forestry; Ecology; Cartography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002052054,0.00009410102,0.00008156326,0.0002838068,0.0001117218,0.0002327947,0.0001101482,0.0001323091,0.0006853522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001012705,0.00006731058,0.00007239407,0.0004176196,0.0001092741,0.0001478562,0.0001004584,0.00007881909,0.0001259704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002325863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007135053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01216985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02550164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998956,0.00002377239,0.000008583932,0.0000294599,0.00002327287,0.00001941027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995518,0.0002017825,0.0001084199,0.00003048835,0.00007231036,0.0000351272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005478723,0.00001967814,0.9882737,0.00001904939,0.00003268224,0.00006287159,0.0001689522,0.0005416349,0.004870237,0.00003062927,0.0001077751,0.00581792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.304186e-7,0.000005827236,0.9989089,0.000001123444,0.000003087923,0.00003029926,0.00006509451,0.0007398064,0.0001341904,0.000008440676,0.000101154,0.000001081784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995734,0.00004017777,0.00007135553,0.00001013475,6.956543e-7,9.627782e-7,0.0001347375,0.000005251002,0.0001632564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996624,0.00001762753,0.00008328706,0.000006612397,0.000001368553,0.000001206949,0.000170495,0.00000199341,0.00005500395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01216985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02797777678425367,"score_gpt":0.2304485597417962,"score_spread":0.2024707829575426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}