{"id":"W2022859143","doi":"10.1080/103503302760212087","title":"Looking Good on Whose Terms? Ambiguity in Two Kellogg's Special K ® Print Advertisements","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Semiotics","topic":"Media, Gender, and Advertising","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foregrounding; Ambiguity; Ethos; Advertising; Politics; Sociology; Feeling; Backlash; Psychology; Aesthetics; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Business; Art","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006612581,0.0001989755,0.0002919917,0.0001003898,0.0009021243,0.00008264027,0.0003492023,0.0001699678,0.0007306949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003576709,0.0002208142,0.000129897,0.000369973,0.0002671511,0.0001690443,0.00009855736,0.0004000872,0.0001712648],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006485456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008234198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009876752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005686597,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973885,0.0003159934,0.0003897496,0.0003707216,0.0007765747,0.0007584452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993339,0.0001111637,0.0001476785,0.0001674701,0.00004620581,0.0001935761],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005511491,0.001140865,0.3137111,0.00008024542,0.0001001103,0.0002278593,0.3470002,0.0001914817,0.00052588,0.05925447,0.01364266,0.26407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0119754,0.0004153792,0.4094692,0.00104564,0.0002498599,0.000005108461,0.06496353,0.002734507,0.002528971,0.07783775,0.4244432,0.004331451],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6041999,0.00007975713,0.00007151711,0.001281167,0.002162457,0.0003800525,0.00000797945,0.00009732684,0.3917198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897106,0.0002231579,0.0001276293,0.0007585794,0.006158921,0.000004313436,0.000004205277,0.00002399811,0.002988629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4108005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9004542,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05107330119935402,"score_gpt":0.3506002299568143,"score_spread":0.2995269287574602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}