{"id":"W2022872731","doi":"10.1139/x10-024","title":"Comparisons between field- and LiDAR-based measures of stand structural complexity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":192,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"NASA Headquarters; Nature Conservancy; Washington State University","keywords":"Lidar; Canopy; Structural complexity; Percentile; Field (mathematics); Remote sensing; Environmental science; Forest ecology; Forest inventory; Forest structure; Geography; Ecology; Physical geography; Forest management; Ecosystem; Forestry; Mathematics; Statistics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001653659,0.0001707905,0.0001362851,0.001400344,0.0001617253,0.0003668388,0.0002276203,0.000160471,0.0006308766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004164106,0.0001064489,0.00009651255,0.0009329373,0.0001900225,0.0005692182,0.0002155394,0.0001551242,0.0001307252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003391218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001808789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006146501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02465333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999494,0.000212107,0.00003575208,0.00008404726,0.0001441202,0.00002999339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970441,0.001441907,0.0004071706,0.0001759015,0.0008098357,0.0001209206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002252923,0.0001637198,0.9713187,0.00004189918,0.0001531685,0.0000163794,0.0002061101,0.001244975,0.00662448,0.000199545,0.0002205781,0.01958511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001623848,0.0002131028,0.9934155,0.000007286001,0.00002053441,0.00007148222,0.0002965872,0.004382099,0.001070733,0.000117069,0.000382211,0.000007230562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973689,0.0001418778,0.001304463,0.000008630415,0.000003952759,0.00001525823,0.000284144,0.000009091739,0.0008636283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967848,0.00007899803,0.002199124,0.00001200869,0.000006595772,0.0000278039,0.0006768482,0.000003209652,0.0002105963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006146501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01222146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1186791273540472,"score_gpt":0.3441606639020126,"score_spread":0.2254815365479654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}