{"id":"W2022896024","doi":"10.1109/icnnsp.2008.4590322","title":"A method for pitch estimation from noisy speech signals based on a pitch-harmonic extraction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Speech and Audio Processing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Pitch detection algorithm; Fast Fourier transform; Estimator; Harmonic; Computer science; Speech recognition; Maxima and minima; Harmonic analysis; Frequency domain; Speech enhancement; Acoustics; Algorithm; Mathematics; Speech processing; Artificial intelligence; Noise reduction; Physics; Statistics; Computer vision; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007079557,0.0006631849,0.0008797827,0.00122949,0.0003910486,0.0007402276,0.0008428704,0.0006862564,0.002316226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002009968,0.0004038126,0.000449038,0.0006332521,0.0004045035,0.001103242,0.0006813714,0.0009888739,0.001364348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002205412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004065626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000408407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007514657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994044,0.00007908607,0.00004576243,0.0001510495,0.000294306,0.00002547384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990488,0.0003878199,0.0001043343,0.0001359733,0.0002861516,0.00003691273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002719895,0.00006498089,0.0008392123,0.0003638351,0.00009384854,0.0001855893,0.0001119289,0.007835818,0.2050053,0.004319955,0.001439269,0.7794682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001337235,0.0006002766,0.006866077,0.00008135055,0.0001964957,0.003391985,0.0001056055,0.6737815,0.2797732,0.005109048,0.02975936,0.0002012641],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003552163,0.0002790516,0.995334,0.00002746149,0.00006906466,0.00003017263,0.00004325861,0.0002921651,0.0003726617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04625788,0.0003386683,0.9515409,0.000031684,0.0001244904,0.00007231357,0.0001397489,0.00006571372,0.001428588],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002316226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007748604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03994504874770301,"score_gpt":0.3238853339396443,"score_spread":0.2839402851919413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}