{"id":"W2022913967","doi":"10.1002/meet.2009.14504603113","title":"Evidence of a new and evolving discipline: Neuroethics literature, 2002–2007","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Neuroethics; Bioethics; Engineering ethics; Field (mathematics); Object (grammar); Medical ethics; Ethical issues; Psychology; Neuroscience; Political science; Law; Psychiatry; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0200636,0.0002241234,0.0006712523,0.04914157,0.001897064,0.0106606,0.001231052,0.001572623,0.005754419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1292853,0.0002954967,0.0004169406,0.09642792,0.003935372,0.006360192,0.004586465,0.001712966,0.0006258606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008026424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01258024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01107594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01847512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.983654,0.004578576,0.00293617,0.001381497,0.006923998,0.0005256778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7525331,0.1149868,0.06850914,0.005712545,0.05407931,0.00417911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000522324,0.0002229005,0.5315272,0.0117149,0.0007858964,0.001242361,0.03463388,0.0006168241,0.00107295,0.065367,0.06167666,0.2906172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000355381,0.00006189432,0.7914956,0.01008538,0.0002488102,0.0009385979,0.03945189,0.0004794625,0.0007736147,0.00466963,0.1517079,0.00005174241],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6221349,0.1772637,0.001746579,0.09448665,0.001760471,0.0001789641,0.01043416,0.00009964569,0.09189498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9414558,0.04550332,0.001227467,0.00363454,0.001298211,0.0001036585,0.003535595,0.0000448662,0.003196514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9799364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1061077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0487672184289251,"score_gpt":0.3423295515225743,"score_spread":0.2935623330936492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}