{"id":"W2022930142","doi":"10.1007/s00199-004-0580-7","title":"The folk theorem revisited","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Curse of dimensionality; Public finance; Simple (philosophy); Inertia; Action (physics); Folk theorem; Mathematical economics; Face (sociological concept); Contrast (vision); Decomposition; Key (lock); Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Repeated game; Game theory; Epistemology; Computer security; Physics; Classical mechanics; Philosophy; Macroeconomics; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003482357,0.0005438365,0.00135369,0.001549136,0.002635304,0.005233303,0.00181085,0.003741903,0.01942026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01128912,0.0004177624,0.001000976,0.001446486,0.009340646,0.01112739,0.00206551,0.0072923,0.002751164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002609804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001160166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002328477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001625848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980464,0.0007514493,0.00007479135,0.0004803608,0.0004625052,0.0001845185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955531,0.003146835,0.0001799652,0.0005253482,0.0004877605,0.0001069962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005093728,0.00000327154,0.00004090629,0.00001673192,0.000005667289,0.00001484035,0.00005372044,0.00009117731,0.00001625446,0.9935147,0.004144319,0.002093293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004385319,0.000002022585,0.00004897155,0.00001330037,0.000002540173,0.00002507377,0.00002354167,0.0003277334,0.00002042815,0.9921704,0.007358698,0.000002863223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02087514,0.01741622,0.1798962,0.1388152,0.004622546,0.00005105188,0.0006251188,0.0002779702,0.6374206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.790468,0.008548157,0.03871278,0.03521543,0.008270692,0.0002500667,0.0002584964,0.0003364873,0.1179399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01942026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06496727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04432725340367523,"score_gpt":0.344449233244285,"score_spread":0.3001219798406098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}