{"id":"W2023090975","doi":"10.1080/0028825x.2009.9672714","title":"Does the invader <i>Hieracium lepidulum</i> have a comparative growth advantage over co‐occurring plants? High leaf area and low metabolic costs as invasive traits","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand Journal of Botany","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"University of Otago","keywords":"Biology; Specific leaf area; Nutrient; Context (archaeology); Leaf area index; Botany; Ecology; Resource (disambiguation); Agronomy; Photosynthesis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002959993,0.0002009432,0.0004086155,0.00004440186,0.0004258352,0.00008976963,0.0002032253,0.00007682695,0.0002007371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007294834,0.0001064692,0.00007515741,0.00009026737,0.0002290505,0.0004330523,0.00005136276,0.0003862744,0.00003107697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006297923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003580451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001115649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001443062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987342,0.0001229537,0.0003851693,0.0001942084,0.0002875222,0.000275892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998961,0.0003593192,0.0003993464,0.00008711794,0.00002954575,0.0001636665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006501952,0.0003683726,0.94357,0.00001003878,0.0004017005,0.0002457947,0.01241513,0.0006108254,0.01110669,0.0009497561,0.02599953,0.003672029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002016865,0.0004008843,0.9848334,0.00006944225,0.00008449113,0.0002599661,0.001215117,0.0001509477,0.002125385,0.00611036,0.002515567,0.0002175717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937978,0.0005023715,0.00004815744,0.002221547,0.0001619594,0.000169537,0.00001531971,0.000007705924,0.003075552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946954,0.001061145,0.0001430584,0.002690756,0.0001145669,0.000002035584,0.000001245226,0.000006711718,0.001285043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04126346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4341686,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009412176901473055,"score_gpt":0.2500482440319075,"score_spread":0.2406360671304345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}