{"id":"W2023167714","doi":"10.1007/s10661-009-0908-7","title":"Characterizing the forest fragmentation of Canada’s national parks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; University of British Columbia","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Forest fragmentation; Fragmentation (computing); Ecotoxicology; Environmental protection; National park; Geography; Forestry; Environmental science; Ecology; Biodiversity; Archaeology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007203758,0.00004818427,0.00004995498,0.00000227279,0.0002886905,0.000008496401,0.00004841605,0.000017539,0.00001983789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002220411,0.00001823237,0.00001380823,0.00001744024,0.00003551343,0.0000405257,0.00002719907,0.00005094976,4.409223e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005743835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000072558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001975307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002312637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996086,0.00001513703,0.00006803713,0.00007802964,0.0001474725,0.00008269175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998776,0.00004466215,0.00004356301,0.00001186403,0.000003015655,0.00001929515],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006102995,0.00004903857,0.9412273,0.000001058012,0.00001361512,0.000001045235,0.0000675546,0.000008938036,0.04522705,0.00007513849,0.0001466644,0.01317653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004757393,0.00008489198,0.9951299,0.000004279117,0.000004187471,8.458572e-7,0.0008712424,0.00000843583,0.001933661,0.00008262713,0.00179367,0.00003871304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967918,0.00006226006,2.978442e-7,0.002520179,0.00009341924,0.00005270835,0.00001857493,0.000003434445,0.0004573579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996122,0.00008236204,0.00005158089,0.00009117013,0.00008652412,0.000002368313,0.00001530486,1.226312e-7,0.00005834711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0539026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2986086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0128468645278343,"score_gpt":0.2160687539894244,"score_spread":0.2032218894615901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}