{"id":"W2023280563","doi":"10.1016/j.spl.2005.03.012","title":"Strong uniqueness for cyclically symbiotic branching diffusions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics & Probability Letters","topic":"Stochastic processes and financial applications","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Uniqueness; Mathematics; Brownian motion; Branching (polymer chemistry); Branching process; Mathematical analysis; Wiener process; Statistical physics; Applied mathematics; Combinatorics; Statistics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003370071,0.0001838329,0.000341427,0.00008218278,0.0002913816,0.00007890682,0.000288875,0.00007763648,0.00005201713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004837109,0.0002180766,0.00009153653,0.0001787989,0.000138859,0.0001281847,0.00006010006,0.0001641365,0.0001012467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000173457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003659623,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001189942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000129528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983246,0.000006027914,0.0006763656,0.0005345989,0.00004871887,0.0004097148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988963,0.0002792704,0.0002436311,0.0004019829,0.00006751629,0.0001112938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001307842,0.0001289376,0.001597169,0.00008121547,0.00001582719,2.942709e-7,0.0001524851,0.00007537613,0.0002459439,0.9930777,0.0005215931,0.004090413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004267766,0.00004047756,0.0100879,0.00001401234,0.00001429496,0.000001529715,0.000002543153,0.003745062,0.00003180116,0.9775198,0.00782459,0.0002912175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02929537,0.0001010537,0.9616072,0.005622358,0.0001547586,0.0008188205,0.001850193,0.00007242479,0.0004777944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.424155,0.000008588194,0.5735868,0.001526977,0.0002192181,0.0003106616,0.0001153451,0.00003260259,0.00004479101],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3948596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8892905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02746577183289146,"score_gpt":0.2423420264782737,"score_spread":0.2148762546453822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}