{"id":"W2023330110","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.003","title":"Thinking like a scientist: Innateness as a case study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University; Georgia State University; University of Georgia","keywords":"Psychology; Trait; Cognition; Epistemology; Scientific thinking; Scientific reasoning; Philosophy of science; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics education","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002825638,0.0003871658,0.0003687603,0.001003993,0.004297692,0.003050666,0.001235861,0.003566359,0.004236837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01151755,0.0002145759,0.0004742825,0.000616422,0.01069544,0.004729619,0.003189351,0.003473791,0.0004284924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001419238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008346396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00148377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003015104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997922,0.001301727,0.00006465214,0.0001853012,0.0003037862,0.0002226016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929628,0.005017275,0.000402465,0.0008529783,0.000271181,0.0004933064],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003715509,0.001658342,0.04546556,0.0003337867,0.00005595234,0.05985278,0.2200749,0.001135438,0.009739982,0.6113482,0.007975277,0.04198828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001354844,0.0006388465,0.03176117,0.0004835765,0.0001054629,0.2296724,0.1771357,0.01032993,0.01401622,0.4338203,0.1016753,0.0002256335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9063892,0.0009295788,0.01337865,0.00901053,0.0001972851,0.00009635294,0.00009342561,0.00005244461,0.06985241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849451,0.0004364783,0.00906062,0.000568181,0.00005858266,0.00004800897,0.00003063463,0.00002722191,0.004825137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01494354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1565071236670802,"score_gpt":0.3403809406460847,"score_spread":0.1838738169790045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}