{"id":"W2023348403","doi":"10.3152/147154601781767212","title":"Into the fog? Stakeholder input in participatory impact assessment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Citizen journalism; Variety (cybernetics); Bottleneck; Public participation; Environmental planning; Project appraisal; Participatory rural appraisal; Stakeholder engagement; Participatory planning; Environmental resource management; Impact assessment; Participatory GIS; Stakeholder analysis; Plan (archaeology); Business; Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Computer science; Operations management; Geography; Engineering; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001963967,0.0005620151,0.0004875748,0.0001286315,0.0004591001,0.0003021507,0.0004441923,0.0001849457,0.002089162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005615765,0.0003604674,0.0002168367,0.0007146539,0.0005028583,0.001013651,0.0004768303,0.0006809683,0.00006342636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001539184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002709258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00877081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001437332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960471,0.0006213249,0.0005696177,0.0006143247,0.0009201147,0.001227503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984328,0.0004506244,0.0002249068,0.0005091098,0.000009144325,0.0003734236],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000906729,0.0004740642,0.9774694,0.000007177674,0.00008646277,0.00004289259,0.004620501,0.0003025235,0.001940828,0.00006271639,0.00180024,0.01310256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00134424,0.0006096283,0.9897975,0.00002190338,0.00004931846,0.00002779875,0.00203968,0.002061538,0.000053857,0.0004398933,0.003064827,0.0004897635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805765,0.000096691,0.0002298041,0.0007341418,0.0002527997,0.0009413009,0.00001347901,0.00006799991,0.01708726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979739,0.0002515824,0.0007525517,0.0003434031,0.0001476752,0.0002039968,0.00004014336,0.0000535923,0.0002332058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01739733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0662966634487145,"score_gpt":0.433431863031468,"score_spread":0.3671351995827535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}