{"id":"W2023385370","doi":"10.1139/f09-031","title":"Communication and cohesion in aquatic science literature","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subject matter; Cohesion (chemistry); Ecology; Subject (documents); Range (aeronautics); Data science; Aquatic science; Sociology; Aquatic ecosystem; Computer science; Biology; Library science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02402736,0.0003230463,0.0008945981,0.04182415,0.01107487,0.01756457,0.001450139,0.001843234,0.004073089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09074107,0.0004339551,0.0003731647,0.05199613,0.01837544,0.01748051,0.008834924,0.001590854,0.0003021611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01035574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009487223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0080997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007607834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9751269,0.0133726,0.002777627,0.001963964,0.005642557,0.001116241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8131079,0.1527409,0.01389159,0.003366762,0.01475735,0.002135503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009935965,0.00006817676,0.02543931,0.004724611,0.0001108072,0.001294253,0.4221634,0.0005966749,0.0003939198,0.3611085,0.01490168,0.1690993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004499415,0.0001443091,0.06479438,0.01919019,0.0001287865,0.001187664,0.3366185,0.001022206,0.0005443916,0.2181721,0.3580094,0.0001430166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3495569,0.3172712,0.009806168,0.09317406,0.003372425,0.0002128428,0.0004453047,0.0000881349,0.226073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9302536,0.05774671,0.003033192,0.003782014,0.002436373,0.000153266,0.0001767804,0.00003284924,0.002385259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9581758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1270704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00990054792858236,"score_gpt":0.2138865659962663,"score_spread":0.2039860180676839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}