{"id":"W2023548979","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1601_6","title":"Malleable Mental Accounting: The Effect of Flexibility on the Justification of Attractive Spending and Consumption Decisions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Colorado Boulder","keywords":"Mental accounting; Flexibility (engineering); Ambiguity; Consumption (sociology); Control (management); Construct (python library); Process (computing); Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Accounting; Psychology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007379828,0.0001187847,0.0004113677,0.0002491636,0.0001790373,0.00006891587,0.0005515054,0.00009538516,0.0002513976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002235775,0.00005629499,0.0001698885,0.0002159591,0.0005132674,0.0001997259,0.00005510443,0.0002944544,0.00004020466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003168665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002834771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000164623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001546251,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973258,0.0005506898,0.001222783,0.00023326,0.0005331593,0.0001343004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987206,0.01023318,0.001768967,0.0004921893,0.0002641826,0.00003549351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002084751,0.0003486388,0.5485029,0.000005648411,0.00008068457,0.000006860907,0.0003144103,0.0002097199,0.02163713,0.001273794,0.0136141,0.4119214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001490447,0.000840412,0.9511925,0.000109887,0.000151416,0.0003171828,0.0004458798,0.0002252812,0.008474466,0.02909568,0.007527648,0.0001291823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963005,0.0003352504,0.0004321479,0.001084571,0.0007769678,0.0001886333,0.00001435815,0.000002532628,0.0008650635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995623,0.00008938374,0.0001965935,0.00005899338,0.00004286712,0.000001924009,6.368019e-7,0.000005930849,0.00004136794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4117922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2752627,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.199411575573643,"score_gpt":0.4636348922484119,"score_spread":0.2642233166747689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}