{"id":"W2023617068","doi":"10.1007/s10664-009-9125-9","title":"An empirical study on the efficiency of different design pattern representations in UML class diagrams","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Empirical Software Engineering","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université de Montréal; Computer Research Institute of Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Applications of UML; Unified Modeling Language; Class diagram; UML tool; Notation; Program comprehension; Class (philosophy); Software design pattern; Visualization; Software engineering; Programming language; Software; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Software system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02027947,0.0005913535,0.0005523052,0.004107081,0.0006377702,0.002485013,0.001268844,0.00150121,0.001849598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2998863,0.0004933021,0.0008699652,0.004410884,0.001129342,0.006103646,0.00123427,0.001312358,0.0004196599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001369882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001030614,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002094947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002799092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9673718,0.0220432,0.003493045,0.002083818,0.004463454,0.0005447216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2629892,0.6911853,0.01587539,0.01758907,0.01153677,0.0008242631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004695905,0.00604865,0.3310083,0.002022533,0.0005959931,0.0004567836,0.02157659,0.01978074,0.02329476,0.00730397,0.001712853,0.5815029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00145747,0.01005268,0.5982939,0.0009289977,0.001979619,0.0026958,0.02256979,0.2881269,0.04819017,0.0119448,0.0134135,0.0003464893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887682,0.0002930562,0.009249814,0.0001501792,0.000008245389,0.00008897389,0.000164271,0.0001079108,0.001169406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739378,0.0002449983,0.02443776,0.00004540674,0.000009889386,0.00008201064,0.0005194106,0.0001188002,0.0006040132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02027947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1072494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04501694003319926,"score_gpt":0.3352605452715285,"score_spread":0.2902436052383293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}