{"id":"W2023691175","doi":"10.4153/cjm-2010-054-1","title":"Functoriality of the Canonical Fractional Galois Ideal","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Mathematics","topic":"Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Abelian extension; Ideal (ethics); Galois group; Galois module; Pure mathematics; Galois extension; Commutative property; Abelian group; Differential Galois theory; Splitting of prime ideals in Galois extensions; Algebra over a field; Discrete mathematics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001723399,0.0001277597,0.0003433887,0.0001127789,0.0001389765,0.00002588202,0.0005289862,0.0001567057,0.001183877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004111854,0.00008546726,0.0002531141,0.000213238,0.0002573798,0.0000952211,0.00002490003,0.0007239443,0.00001191881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006978598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001796943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005280393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01091707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984873,0.00007972206,0.0007241644,0.00007540714,0.0003993367,0.0002340512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971988,0.0009438832,0.0007155112,0.0004043057,0.0003618831,0.0003755997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000173883,0.0001738852,0.008327133,0.0002246065,0.0002017326,0.00002862,0.001799309,0.000005778075,0.001678251,0.9659932,0.02125821,0.0002918626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004634468,0.00005207683,0.005204536,0.000118621,0.0001514011,0.0006755773,0.0006649161,0.00002077529,0.002965588,0.9745908,0.01492925,0.0001630278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901472,0.0000367302,0.001385989,0.0006336038,0.002912401,0.000101693,0.00002721609,0.000004782532,0.004750345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991679,0.000001148591,0.007282251,0.00007143192,0.0006147927,9.397219e-7,3.850576e-7,0.00001839985,0.0003316094],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01038903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02752748781107089,"score_gpt":0.2699831337166592,"score_spread":0.2424556459055883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}