{"id":"W2024038163","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.017","title":"Assessing the applicability of findings in systematic reviews of complex interventions can enhance the utility of reviews for decision making","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Institute of Population and Public Health; Bruyère; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Psychological intervention; Systematic review; Context (archaeology); Management science; Resource (disambiguation); Population; Intervention (counseling); Documentation; Process (computing); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Data science; MEDLINE; Psychology; Medicine; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7836438,0.0002375606,0.02138924,0.0001959571,0.0000754728,0.00004967418,0.002942855,0.0001792076,0.00177809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8914343,0.00007505685,0.01071783,0.0008690702,0.0005710893,0.0001981192,0.0002079525,0.0005681477,0.00002623583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002368936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001004793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002681262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008976051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5564849,0.258172,0.1815363,0.0009723529,0.002350597,0.0004837709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.05913374,0.7810948,0.1506585,0.005105919,0.003837718,0.0001692511],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009442298,0.0008808905,0.5328326,0.04257684,0.0006142076,5.339401e-7,0.0007307273,0.0001375189,0.0001647317,0.003484633,0.06772924,0.3507537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003907284,0.0003757746,0.8008755,0.02917197,0.0009983393,0.00002245584,0.000982729,0.0253613,0.000009813074,0.131007,0.01065102,0.0001533788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3686784,0.02033169,0.5978774,0.005127347,0.0005911621,0.007055197,0.00001173753,8.63685e-7,0.0003261834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569625,0.001124428,0.04124978,0.0004456942,0.00006559517,0.000111813,4.469426e-7,0.00000508549,0.00003464503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5882841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9613032131429035,"score_gpt":0.7463036265293126,"score_spread":0.2149995866135909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}