{"id":"W2024055326","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.1.1","title":"<i>Rapport minoritaire</i> : La dissidence fait juge","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Unanimity; Vision; Variety (cybernetics); Relation (database); Parallels; State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002059757,0.0003198689,0.0002399961,0.0005485872,0.005044892,0.005020785,0.000723347,0.002098761,0.005542085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01111414,0.0001385306,0.0001693718,0.0004299392,0.008289701,0.003673039,0.002086803,0.005175387,0.0008290008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002275335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001419963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01677307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01549601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998515,0.000778542,0.00004355263,0.0001751078,0.0003132609,0.0001745055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997405,0.00145293,0.000344441,0.0001342716,0.0003574257,0.000305865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001029247,0.00003723874,0.003701478,0.0001636684,0.00001854417,0.001555506,0.2934997,0.00008064753,0.002409202,0.5532131,0.1110333,0.03418471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001324349,0.00007087179,0.005521427,0.0003199277,0.00001840872,0.00201471,0.1174414,0.000281331,0.001919423,0.0220448,0.8503051,0.00004935551],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1429728,0.01308756,0.009309543,0.2478684,0.009713537,0.00006318446,0.0002052248,0.0001563547,0.5766233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9240973,0.003256736,0.001617381,0.009085591,0.002812145,0.00004459034,0.0000529639,0.00009154675,0.05894168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9832269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03335088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01842256369926094,"score_gpt":0.2548530868836951,"score_spread":0.2364305231844342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}