{"id":"W2024062419","doi":"10.1016/j.dsr2.2004.05.011","title":"Comparisons of interannual biomass anomalies of zooplankton communities along the continental margins of British Columbia and Oregon","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deep Sea Research Part II Topical Studies in Oceanography","topic":"Marine and coastal ecosystems","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"North Pacific Marine Science Organization","keywords":"Zooplankton; Continental shelf; Continental margin; Oceanography; Geology; Abundance (ecology); Copepod; Fauna; Anomaly (physics); Geography; Ecology; Paleontology; Crustacean; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007483283,0.00009232209,0.0004501485,0.000140602,0.0002682591,0.00003888888,0.0003317615,0.00005412706,0.0001041531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007575147,0.00008723418,0.00009136461,0.0005857127,0.00220386,0.00009753444,0.0002846267,0.0002549731,5.479752e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004915838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002463446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1595918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8330801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982583,0.0003205877,0.0004976835,0.0001499471,0.0004429182,0.0003305734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988027,0.0006152088,0.0001077802,0.0002036439,0.0002094236,0.00006126108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006518464,0.0001065527,0.992833,0.000311169,0.000123803,0.00001187234,0.002244432,0.000015017,0.00000260208,0.0001180251,0.001305886,0.002862414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007076752,0.000816133,0.9621055,0.0003309299,0.00001126225,0.00001631262,0.03151483,0.0001811416,0.0000577924,0.0004115576,0.003744037,0.0001027983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929407,0.004554702,0.00000421225,0.00015315,0.0001110791,0.0002851892,0.0003585062,0.000007137224,0.001585388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985017,0.00129585,0.00005909297,0.00001269684,0.00003063626,0.00000504733,0.00004605124,0.000002701558,0.00004619771],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6734883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8460045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0544290568940221,"score_gpt":0.2987396113921502,"score_spread":0.2443105544981281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}