{"id":"W2024080854","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0094412","title":"The Reporting of Observational Clinical Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies: A Systematic Review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Functional Brain Connectivity Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health Research Institute; Baycrest Hospital; University of Calgary; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Checklist; MEDLINE; Sample size determination; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Meta-analysis; Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology; Publication bias; Medicine; Magnetic resonance imaging; Confounding; Psychology; Confidence interval; Clinical psychology; Medical physics; Statistics; Pathology; Internal medicine; Cognitive psychology; Radiology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2852215,0.002522503,0.009903032,0.01874286,0.002431135,0.008196775,0.005507398,0.005827011,0.005721972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6612285,0.003498648,0.006763063,0.02395411,0.005803366,0.01163394,0.004775007,0.003591472,0.001491452],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008372302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02758227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00420241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004949799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4346514,0.2707448,0.2347415,0.01366919,0.04431717,0.001875873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1756811,0.522769,0.2063163,0.02212322,0.07069843,0.002412012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003325464,0.00002537071,0.003118792,0.9253278,0.00497456,0.0001316603,0.001544993,0.0002209117,0.0004774867,0.001638698,0.0112913,0.05091592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007760159,0.0002194201,0.005747817,0.9418162,0.01099158,0.0004044368,0.0008524595,0.0004460609,0.0005455574,0.004402312,0.03365393,0.0001442212],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.005048553,0.9279874,0.02307522,0.018252,0.003450968,0.01509195,0.004779758,0.0002185973,0.002095583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1042405,0.7090461,0.08921292,0.01046091,0.003423397,0.0789455,0.003791346,0.0002126409,0.0006667019],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7147784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8814491,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5482345187145269,"score_gpt":0.4251887685852516,"score_spread":0.1230457501292753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}