{"id":"W2024165648","doi":"10.1071/bt08163","title":"Dormancy in Caladenia: a Bayesian approach to evaluating latency","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Botany","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Dormancy; Biology; Population; Conservation biology; Ecology; Temperate climate; Mark and recapture; Bayesian probability; Demography; Botany; Statistics; Germination; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008163026,0.000592473,0.0009255414,0.0026515,0.0007307773,0.001842156,0.001790655,0.001147413,0.002475895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02692106,0.000660517,0.001172734,0.001154909,0.0007480405,0.002237139,0.001466618,0.001434177,0.0002482561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001436037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001100103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01797472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01398863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984357,0.0006915021,0.0001538464,0.0003956296,0.0001893559,0.0001339803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982864,0.01354148,0.00174605,0.0004623313,0.0009808277,0.000405338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001049247,0.0002868481,0.3219787,0.0003556411,0.0008078823,0.0006107493,0.001549455,0.4740883,0.008396054,0.02427768,0.001387238,0.1652122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004135572,0.0001783312,0.03605846,0.00007551571,0.0001382211,0.0002911691,0.0001918467,0.9438341,0.0007601047,0.01736611,0.0009855716,0.00007924326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4977083,0.001214045,0.4948991,0.0003332291,0.00003322155,0.0004513694,0.001146651,0.0003893169,0.003824725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9190111,0.0003379593,0.07787935,0.00008889436,0.00005078218,0.0003013711,0.001058922,0.00005483809,0.00121669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01797472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04317069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08215448358711906,"score_gpt":0.2799447672560164,"score_spread":0.1977902836688973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}