{"id":"W2024170532","doi":"10.1038/modpathol.3800555","title":"Chromogenic in-situ hybridization: a viable alternative to fluorescence in-situ hybridization in the HER2 testing algorithm","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Pathology","topic":"HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"","keywords":"CISH; Chromogenic in situ hybridization; Concordance; Immunohistochemistry; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Gene duplication; Biology; In situ hybridization; Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2; Pathology; Molecular biology; Medicine; Cancer; Bioinformatics; Gene; Breast cancer; Genetics; Gene expression","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004037895,0.001072706,0.001073371,0.002882839,0.0007366932,0.002231774,0.00241161,0.001480658,0.008889351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004288971,0.0006570554,0.0008517644,0.00109676,0.001793792,0.00158348,0.001185674,0.002530822,0.002237331],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006901743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009402945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007990558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001677374,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977271,0.001142962,0.00008639944,0.0002929139,0.0006163949,0.0001343079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972975,0.001473267,0.0001470851,0.0003915539,0.0005481072,0.0001425459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001362868,0.0002742879,0.01101248,0.0008882522,0.0002682204,0.002167861,0.0003594666,0.004880713,0.2465917,0.1188605,0.009249359,0.6040842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003488238,0.001579139,0.01195547,0.0004186277,0.0007719453,0.03879684,0.0007256204,0.2126323,0.3967192,0.1743472,0.1613155,0.0003893037],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008501405,0.002071148,0.9796586,0.001366844,0.0004676988,0.000119767,0.00008410397,0.0009770745,0.006753361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1138957,0.003336671,0.8751151,0.0006872293,0.0002969623,0.0002338059,0.0001451683,0.0002423456,0.006047058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008889351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02973783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03722846614933295,"score_gpt":0.3216552942648424,"score_spread":0.2844268281155094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}