{"id":"W2024234081","doi":"10.1260/1757-2258.4.1-2.41","title":"On Numerical Techniques for Determination of the Sonic Point in Unsteady Inviscid Shock Reflections","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Aerospace Innovations","topic":"Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inviscid flow; Mach number; Shock (circulatory); Shock tube; Perturbation (astronomy); Mechanics; Compressible flow; Shock wave; Regular polygon; Mathematics; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Acoustics; Compressibility; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003195014,0.00009229925,0.0001260019,0.0003556531,0.00003999639,0.00002425912,0.0002540369,0.00005341692,0.00000708713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002289092,0.00007703048,0.00009703335,0.0004742113,0.00002792911,0.0002671218,0.00002939014,0.0002199367,8.727452e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003320055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000579119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005038455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003239793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99898,0.00001833903,0.0005137239,0.00005613737,0.0003073415,0.0001244408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988397,0.0002082817,0.000210468,0.00008856913,0.0006267356,0.00002628093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000145176,0.001048027,0.02121269,0.00005601631,0.0002749265,0.000003299435,0.001630671,0.2821052,0.0703548,0.5945106,0.003824598,0.02483403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00241804,0.0005631997,0.1278349,0.0008503794,0.00007753297,0.0002954818,0.0004855091,0.7703744,0.02752436,0.06238719,0.006450968,0.000738106],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4231648,0.00003175398,0.5712098,0.002843921,0.00179944,0.000212821,0.00004383829,0.00002715419,0.0006664912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834697,0.00001193404,0.01614782,0.0001103026,0.0001810304,0.00001380583,0.00001010942,0.00001654226,0.00003874226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5603049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3141212,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01348075750062807,"score_gpt":0.2984397763875896,"score_spread":0.2849590188869615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}