{"id":"W2024234081","doi":"10.1260/1757-2258.4.1-2.41","title":"On Numerical Techniques for Determination of the Sonic Point in Unsteady Inviscid Shock Reflections","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Aerospace Innovations","topic":"Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inviscid flow; Mach number; Shock (circulatory); Shock tube; Perturbation (astronomy); Mechanics; Compressible flow; Shock wave; Regular polygon; Mathematics; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Acoustics; Compressibility; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001348773,0.0005930337,0.0005416953,0.0008700466,0.000347103,0.0005261134,0.0008409314,0.0006230521,0.001163977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005135536,0.0003220875,0.0004644461,0.0005756527,0.001160527,0.0008039649,0.0009331857,0.001132101,0.0005178366],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000357628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005390985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004150579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003810203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991303,0.0002577254,0.00003368678,0.0000456661,0.0005021952,0.00003047948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977086,0.001407664,0.0001870216,0.0002613863,0.0004052632,0.00003018385],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003782948,0.0001340635,0.001896969,0.0008144567,0.00008345264,0.0003419574,0.0006338164,0.4279125,0.1964301,0.09828003,0.0008110436,0.2722833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002889138,0.0001704386,0.0006514167,0.00006627596,0.00001764036,0.0002722699,0.00006233155,0.9163659,0.0670249,0.01122577,0.004072731,0.00004130596],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009505145,0.0001760664,0.9887833,0.00002687964,0.00002131837,0.00004364341,0.000007508084,0.000140454,0.00129565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1434818,0.0006773866,0.8541011,0.00002513455,0.00003109777,0.0001240538,0.00005225782,0.0001019493,0.001405234],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001348773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007133126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01348075750062807,"score_gpt":0.2984397763875896,"score_spread":0.2849590188869615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}