{"id":"W2024290100","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2003.11.006","title":"Urinary screening for methylphenidate (Ritalin) abuse: a comparison of liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, and immunoassay methods","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Biochemistry","topic":"Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Saskatchewan Health","funders":"","keywords":"Chromatography; Mass spectrometry; Chemistry; Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry; Selected reaction monitoring; Immunoassay; Detection limit; Gas Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Metabolite; Tandem mass spectrometry; Methylphenidate; Atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization; Drugs of abuse; Gas chromatography; Electrospray ionization; Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; Urine; Chemical ionization; Drug; Medicine; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; Pharmacology; Ionization","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006149023,0.0006812857,0.001905412,0.0004352928,0.0004649343,0.00004015667,0.0006389426,0.001716618,0.0007901527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001621018,0.0006776886,0.001293833,0.001442762,0.002128679,0.0001137132,0.0001126212,0.001803271,0.00001109948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004927741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001494955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005906117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002017037,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936243,0.001638945,0.002132074,0.001257478,0.0003005391,0.001046643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926895,0.004570822,0.001029622,0.0008330681,0.0002498312,0.000627189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001830189,0.001896827,0.08616727,0.0004208442,0.004431818,0.00004258541,0.0001574784,0.0000285673,0.89763,0.001070595,0.002476544,0.003847288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004750274,0.002038761,0.00200753,0.00007890277,0.001936984,0.0000864521,0.0007355349,0.001787516,0.9747791,0.002619676,0.008324371,0.0008549413],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9160782,0.01397767,0.065226,0.0003407399,0.0008904086,0.0005866945,0.0001712969,0.0001863557,0.002542691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7692032,0.001241623,0.2285702,0.000318463,0.0002575305,0.00006949888,0.0001031644,0.00005844096,0.0001778864],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1633442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1009056893562594,"score_gpt":0.4809231495858983,"score_spread":0.3800174602296389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}