{"id":"W2024350586","doi":"10.1007/s12273-013-0159-y","title":"Life cycle assessment of a single-family residential building in Canada: A case study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Building Simulation","topic":"Sustainable Building Design and Assessment","field":"Engineering","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Roof; Architectural engineering; Engineering; Consumption (sociology); Civil engineering; Occupancy; Single-family detached home; Energy consumption; Environmental impact assessment; Function (biology); Building design; Transport engineering; Production (economics); Geography; Economics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005899764,0.0005544411,0.0005488369,0.001013661,0.003541344,0.001450338,0.002061173,0.001027523,0.002534407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001088285,0.0003083051,0.0006531806,0.001834858,0.0008871348,0.0004496058,0.000710963,0.0005711681,0.0002441406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03416818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02322926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9759899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995472,0.0000629612,0.00001130925,0.00004469002,0.0001666901,0.0001671793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993516,0.0001370704,0.00003104888,0.00003041804,0.0003208812,0.000129088],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001286025,0.00274553,0.1610908,0.0004795562,0.0002262068,0.007099183,0.007587819,0.6663548,0.01338885,0.01117194,0.006862412,0.121707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001684598,0.0009100126,0.1979034,0.000162985,0.0002120153,0.0007320131,0.02898649,0.7395135,0.008276824,0.002493049,0.02041351,0.0002277507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905999,0.0001201741,0.001162756,0.0001739064,0.000005242652,0.0001059172,0.0005513316,0.00003663364,0.007244266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935155,0.0001484401,0.002048702,0.00001915632,0.000001229204,0.00002493293,0.0003138675,0.00001301762,0.003915116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03416818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2479087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01896166860540582,"score_gpt":0.280452784927879,"score_spread":0.2614911163224731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}